That's wheel rate, right? - not spring rate? I'd expect that in an aero
car, which the ralt would be, wheel rates would need to be high compared to
non-aero - or to put it another way, the wheel rate might need to be
compared to the corner weight plus the aero-load.
At 08:52 PM 01/27/2000 -0500, Derek Harling wrote:
>Brian
>
>I'm going to be interested in what replies you get. I have to answer the same
>question myself.
>
>On the Ralt I just stripped PO had 189 front, 312 rear - not too far off
>the FF
>"formula" you mentioned.
>
>I've just asked Phil Hill what he recommends for the NTM - also on slicks but
>narrower ones. I asked him if he thought 161 fr, 270 rear was about right.
>Haven't heard back from him because he's down for the IRL opener this weekend.
>
>Pls post any replies you get that aren't copied to the list. Or post a
>summary.
>
>Ta Ta
>Derek
|