Van...
Yeah! I makes me think though. I always felt my early TR3's performance might
be enhanced if the engine were lower and an inch or so back. Of course, that's
probably not the way to do it.
Bill Dentinger
-----Original Message-----
From: van.mulders.marcel--- via Fot <fot at autox.team.net>
To: Alec Buchan <agb at compsnw.com>
Cc: fot <fot at autox.team.net>
Sent: Wed, Jun 6, 2018 9:48 am
Subject: Re: [Fot] Beaten by equipment...Pacific NW edition.
I bought these mounts on an oldtimer show in the UK. The are probably from a
Land Rover, not a Range Rover. Height is about
1".
PS : Dont forget that the gearbox mount is more important than the engine
mounts to keep the engine from moving forward and rearward!
Van: "Alec Buchan" <agb at compsnw.com>
Aan: fmccjr at aol.com, "van mulders marcel" <van.mulders.marcel at telenet.be>
Cc: "fot" <fot at autox.team.net>
Verzonden: Woensdag 6 juni 2018 15:39:23
Onderwerp: Re: [Fot] Beaten by equipment...Pacific NW edition.
The Land Range Rover (1987-1995) look just like the round TR4 mounts. Did
you use these or modify others?
Thanks.
On 6/6/2018 6:35 AM, fmccjr at aol.com wrote:
My car (TR3) has square tube steel mounts, capped on one side... they are a
pain to tighten, but there will be no chance the engine will drop.
Everything else on the car...another story!
Rick McCurdy
Newburgh, NY
On Jun 6, 2018, at 4:02 AM, van.mulders.marcel--- via Fot <fot at
autox.team.net> wrote:
I fitted Land Rover engine mounts, and a fixation at the top of the engine. The
engine mounts of an off road car are supposed to be very strong.
Marcel
----- Oorspronkelijk bericht -----
Van: "fot" <fot at autox.team.net>
Aan: "fot" <fot at autox.team.net>
Verzonden: Woensdag 6 juni 2018 02:47:41
Onderwerp: [Fot] Beaten by equipment...Pacific NW edition.
I've got an issue...lots of issues, but this refers to my TR4.
Raced in my first event of the year this past weekend at the Spokane
Festival of Speed (SOVREN)
Car did well but in my third session, going down the back straight, over
a couple bumps, my throttle went wide open 'on its own'. Once back in
the paddock, we found that both front engine mounts had failed and the
engine dropped below the mount on the carburetor side, forcing the
throttle to its maximum position.
These were brand new mounts as one failed at our Fall Finale, last
September in Seattle. Also, these two events are the only events I have
run my 'spare' motor which I picked up in CA last year. Engine seems to
do well but the combination of its torque, combined with the quality of
the mounts, is very frustrating. I tried to take a photo of how it
currently sits, but couldn't focus well enough. I am running the round
mounts, "Engine Mount Uprated TR4 TR4A (SKU 130985)" from a PNW
supplier. Three mounts in two events is not a good pattern.
Any thoughts or alternatives is greatly appreciated.
Alec Buchan
aka the Blue Caboose.
_______________________________________________
fot at autox.team.net
http://www.fot-racing.com
Archive: http://www.team.net/pipermail/fot
_______________________________________________
fot at autox.team.net
http://www.fot-racing.com
Archive: http://www.team.net/pipermail/fot
--
_______________________________________________
fot at autox.team.net
http://www.fot-racing.com
Archive: http://www.team.net/pipermail/fot
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://autox.team.net/pipermail/fot/attachments/20180606/50700f21/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: emailsignature4.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 22639 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
<http://autox.team.net/pipermail/fot/attachments/20180606/50700f21/attachment.jpg>
|
