triumphs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TR] Triumphs Digest, Vol 4, Issue 18

To: triumphs@autox.team.net
Subject: Re: [TR] Triumphs Digest, Vol 4, Issue 18
From: Don Spence <dkspence@telus.net>
Date: Fri, 15 Jan 2010 14:22:16 -0700
Michael
  Well it is true that Vanagon and 914 prosches suffered from regular  
antifreeze they did just fine on a phosphorus free antifreeze/water  
blend. It was the phosphorus that corroded the aluminum.

I believe the earlier reference was a tongue in cheek reference to  
air cooled VWs.



On 15-Jan-10, at 12:00 PM, triumphs-request@autox.team.net wrote:

> From: Michael Porter <mdporter@dfn.com>
> Date: January 14, 2010 7:28:39 PM MST (CA)
> To: Kevin McNelis <kmcnelis@nmsu.edu>
> Cc: Triumph' <triumphs@autox.team.net>, '6 Pack list'  
> <6pack@autox.team.net>,  'list
> Subject: Re: [TR] [6pack] waterless coolant
>
>
> Kevin McNelis wrote:
>> Maybe I'm being a bit dense here, but didn't old VWs use AIR as a  
>> coolant??
>>
>>
> Oh, yes, true for the pre-1980 engines in Bugs and vans, but, I  
> think the reference is to the so-called Wasserboxer engines in the  
> Vanagons.  Those engines initially used a water/glycol mix which  
> encouraged corrosion in the aluminum alloy used in the block and  
> heads, which largely showed up as erosion of the material in the  
> seal lands and leakage around the coolant o-ring seals between  
> block and head.
>
> Thus a revised coolant (and block material, I think) to correct the  
> problem.
>
>
> Cheers.
>
> -- 
>
>
> Michael Porter

_______________________________________________

Support Team.Net  http://www.team.net/donate.html

Suggested annual donation  $11.47



Triumphs@autox.team.net
http://autox.team.net/mailman/listinfo/triumphs

http://www.team.net/archive

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
  • Re: [TR] Triumphs Digest, Vol 4, Issue 18, Don Spence <=