OOPS ! I meant to say "I completely agree with Oliver" Sorry.
Tom
----- Original Message -----
From: "Tom Note" <tom628@verizon.net>
To: "Ibsen Dow" <flashtr3@cox.net>; "Tony Gordon" <triumph@2simpleusa.com>;
"TR list" <triumphs@autox.team.net>
Sent: Monday, May 19, 2008 11:27 PM
Subject: Re: [TR] Inlet Manifold Question
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Ibsen Dow" <flashtr3@cox.net>
> To: "Tony Gordon" <triumph@2simpleusa.com>; "TR list"
> <triumphs@autox.team.net>
> Sent: Monday, May 19, 2008 10:26 AM
> Subject: Re: [TR] Inlet Manifold Question
>
>
>> Since this seems to be a weakness in the design of the head, the
>> tri-manifold
>> with Weber's, SU's or Stromberg's that are now available for the TR 6
>> cylinder
>> engine makes more sense, if you are looking for top end performance.
>>
>> Speaking of the tri-manifolds available, is there much performance on the
>> low
>> end of the RPM (torque), especially with triple SU's or triple
>> Stromsburg's,
>> to make that investment to convert from 2 carb to 3 carb set-up?
>>
>> Ibsen
>>
>
> Ibsen: I completely agree with Ibsen. The triple carbs made a very
> noticeable difference. Not only more top end power but stronger in
> mid-range
> and at the bottom as well.
>
> Tom
> _______________________________________________
>
> Support Team.Net http://www.team.net/donate.html
>
> This list supported in part by the Vintage Triumph Register
> http://www.vtr.org
>
>
> Triumphs@autox.team.net
> http://autox.team.net/mailman/listinfo/triumphs
>
> You are subscribed as tom628@verizon.net
>
> http://www.team.net/archive
_______________________________________________
Support Team.Net http://www.team.net/donate.html
This list supported in part by the Vintage Triumph Register
http://www.vtr.org
Triumphs@autox.team.net
http://autox.team.net/mailman/listinfo/triumphs
http://www.team.net/archive
|