triumphs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TR] Long term experince w/ Chevy valve stem seals?

To: aribert@c3net.net, triumphs@autox.team.net
Subject: Re: [TR] Long term experince w/ Chevy valve stem seals?
From: Dave1massey@cs.com
Date: Thu, 4 Jan 2007 08:29:32 EST
In a message dated 1/3/2007 9:19:52 PM Central Standard Time, 
aribert@c3net.net writes: 
> About 5 or 6 years ago on this list there was a fair amount of
> discussion to retrofitting bronze valve guides to be able to use Chevy
> small block valve stem seals on the TR6 engine.  Any one out there with
> do so (and have say a minimum of 25,000 to 30,000 miles on the engine)?
> If so is it worth the trouble?

I had this done to my TR6 when I had the head reworked.  My oil consumption 
actually dropped.  This is probably due to the compression ratio increase which 
suggest that my oil consumption is due to worn rings.  Was it worth the 
trouble?  Apparently not in my case.  Blowby accounted for much more 
consumption 
than worn valve guides.  Maybe your rings are in much better shape than mine 
are 
(probably so)

> 
> I have about 60,000 miles on my engine with a recently blown head
> gasket.  I'm about to pull the head.  Once the head is off, I'll check
> the clearances in the guides.  Assuming that the guide bore diameters
> are in spec, it would be easy for me to machine grooves in the guides to
> suit the stem seals (I have both a lathe and a press for removing the
> guides).

If clearances are in spec why not leave well enough alone?  Unless you are 
going after bragging rights 1700 to 1800 miles per quart is pretty respectable 
in this engine.

Dave


===  This list supported in part by The Vintage Triumph Register
===     http://www.vtr.org



<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>