triumphs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Non TR, but a newer LBC question

To: hoyt@cavtel.net, triumphs@autox.team.net
Subject: Re: Non TR, but a newer LBC question
From: Dave1massey@cs.com
Date: Sun, 5 Mar 2006 12:01:24 EST
In a message dated 3/4/2006 11:09:41 PM Central Standard Time, 
hoyt@cavtel.net writes: 
> On Saturday 04 March 2006 16:24, Michael Marr wrote:
> >  However, the satellite radio antenna coax is different from standard
> >coax (it has a much smaller diameter) and it has a different connector.
> >  Does anybody know if there is any reason which the existing coax could 
> not
> >be used, and is anybody aware of an adapter that would connect my satellite
> >radio antenna coax to standard coax?
> 
> Satellite frequencies are much higher than cellular phones. Coaxial cable 
> losses are greater at higher frequencies and the impedencies  of the coax 
> may 
> be different. I woudl stick with the satellite radio antenna coax for the 
> satellite radio antenna.
> 
> -- 
> Hoyt
> KB4OQ
Not to mention the characteristic impeadence may be different.

Dave
N0FEJ


===  This list supported in part by The Vintage Triumph Register
===     http://www.vtr.org


===  unsubscribe/change address requests to majordomo@autox.team.net

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>