triumphs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Calipers (was gearbox mount)

To: "Triumphs List" <triumphs@autox.team.net>
Subject: Re: Calipers (was gearbox mount)
From: "JustBrits_com" <justbrits@comcast.net>
Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2005 18:11:16 -0600
OK folks, back on my soap box<VBG>!!!

Tony wrote...............

<<I have eard here that the bolts are tensioned to create a certain degree
of elongation of the bolt itself. >>

Yep.

<< Re-using the bolts does not replicate the pre-load of the bolts in a
reproducible way.  >>

You can't because it is already STRETCHED to it's "design" limit!!

<<Therefore the bolt might fail, or allow too much stretching.>>

Yep and past it's designed "allowable" "stretch".

<<  Both outcomes could result in catastrophic failure.>>

Correct and NOT good.

<<The answer is to have new bolts, but no one knows where to get them. >>

Some Companies DO!!

<< I THINK that new versions of these calipers are being made, so I would
have thought that one could either get new bolts>>

Most likely, all specs except size and shape have CHANGED making the above
moot.

<< or get exact specifications for the bolts to find a source of a good
replacement.  Unfortunately, I have seen neither new bolts, nor the
specifications.>>

Nor will you.

<<Also, I have heard of NO, ZERO, ZIP reports of failures of split and
rebuilt units.  Of course there may be no reports because dead men tell no
tales....>>

Almost, Tony<G>.

Ever heard of Product Liability Insurance??  IMHO, the very LAST
"person"/"company" in the Universe to release that sort of info would
be........................????

Another somewhat interesting thing is that whilst we CAN (and do too often)
re-use bolts like Cylinder Head ones, we really should not.  BUT, that said,
the "stress/stretch" on them is way less and way less catastrophic.  Do you
thibnk NASCAR/IRL/F-1 re-use head bolts??<G>

As a point of info, once a fastener has been torqued to the specification
for it, said spec no longer applies!!!  PERIOD.  (It is no longer the "same"
fastener!!)

And just one other "insurance" point<G>.  My shop keepers ins. is WAY less
after my agent (a long, long time ago<VBG>) gave me an option of NEVER
rebuilding ANY "hydraulic" components. "Systems" with or w/o new/re-built
(by someone else) IS OK.
Guess which way I went!?!?!

Nomex on!!

Regards and ALL have a Happy New Year!!!

Ed

PS:  This subject has most likely got more hits in MJB's Archives than any
other!!


===  This list supported in part by The Vintage Triumph Register
===     http://www.vtr.org



<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>