OK then how about just people's choice overall and people's choice for
each model and say to heck with the judging. Judging by one's peers
and that's that. The judges are free to not judge and wander at their
leisure and the winner's get to know that people like their car best.
Nice ego boost for the winner and no one to blame for the uhhh second
place finisher's. (everyone else)
Work for you?
On Thursday, June 16, 2005, at 10:12 AM, Lou Metelko wrote:
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Don Spence" <dkspence@telus.net>
>
> Sent: Thursday, June 16, 2005 10:40 AM
> Subject: Re: VTR concours judging
>
>
>> Maybe it would be a lot better for all if VTR published it's judging
>> criteria on their website. Then all involved, owners, judges, etc.
>> would know what the expectations were in this particular "Fun
>> Concours". Might go a ways towards minimizing conflicts, hurt feelings
>
>
> Great idea Don. Now if VTR just had a judging critera booklet! The
> lack of
> a Concours guide is the crux of the problem.
>
> Lou Metelko
>
> BearTranserv@aol.com writes:
>> Sorry, but even though it's just in fun and even though the judges are
>> volunteers, not knowing what was good or bad about your car kind of
>> defeats the
>> purpose of having it judged. Why not just pull a name out of a hat.
>>
>>
>
> The best way to know what a judge is thinking is to volunteer.
>
> Onery right back at you.
>
> Dave
|