triumphs
[Top] [All Lists]

RE: TR3 ignition mystery demystifyed

To: triumphs@Autox.Team.Net
Subject: RE: TR3 ignition mystery demystifyed
Date: Mon, 13 Dec 2004 10:55:13 -0600 6.0.3HF125 | November 26, 2003) at 12/13/2004 10:55:14, Serialize complete at 12/13/2004 10:55:14, Itemize by SMTP Server on SMTPMTA2/i2Tech(Release 6.0.1CF1 | March 06, 2003) at 12/13/2004 10:55:15 AM, Serialize by Router on SMTPMTA2/i2Tech(Release 6.0.1CF1 | March 06, 2003) at 12/13/2004 10:55:18 AM, Serialize complete at 12/13/2004 10:55:18 AM
I've never installed an electronic ignition so I have no direct experience 
with them,  but after being on this list for 5 or 6 years, I've seen 
enough of these cautionary emails about random failures of electronic 
ignitions that I don't think I would ever want to install one.  I've 
always run with points and have NEVER had an ignition failure (knock on 
the wood dash for luck).  I find the good old fashioned points to be rock 
solid reliable for me and easy to service.  Further, I'm always amused by 
the implied claims in the advertisements for electronic ignitions that 
they will increase performance.  Again, I cannot claim direct experience 
having never run electronic, but that doesn't seem very likely either. But 
I could be wrong.  Wouldn't be the first time.  ;-)

Greg Hutmacher
1976 TR6
Denton, TX

Date: Fri, 10 Dec 2004 18:52:54 -0800
From "Randall" <tr3driver at comcast.net>
Subject: RE: TR3 ignition mystery demystifyed

> It was the Petronix Ignitor electronic ignition module(s).

Welcome to the club, Jim.  One of the worst aspects of the Pertronix 
design
is also it's only selling point (IMO) ... the heat sensitive electronics 
are
housed inside the distributor, where they always run at engine 
temperature.
Doing so shortens their life and leads to weird intermittent heat-related
problems.  Also because of space limitations, the design is fairly crude 
and
doesn't, for example, shut down the output transistor when the engine is 
not
running.




<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>