To: | triumphs@autox.team.net |
---|---|
Subject: | VTR 2004 Convention Update |
From: | Greg_Hutmacher@i2.com |
Date: | Tue, 24 Feb 2004 12:32:05 -0600 6.0.3HF125 | November 26, 2003) at 02/24/2004 12:32:06, Serialize complete at 02/24/2004 12:32:06, Itemize by SMTP Server on SMTPMTA2/i2Tech(Release 6.0.1CF1 | March 06, 2003) at 02/24/2004 12:32:07 PM, Serialize by Router on SMTPMTA2/i2Tech(Release 6.0.1CF1 | March 06, 2003) at 02/24/2004 12:32:09 PM, Serialize complete at 02/24/2004 12:32:09 PM |
"...they came through when absolutely "NO-CLUB" came forward to host the 2003 convention..." I think that many of us on the list (speaking for myself at least) had no idea that finding a club willing to host was such a challenge. I had just assumed that clubs would be clamoring for the honor of hosting the VTR (kind of like cities fighting to host the Olympics). I had no idea that it was difficult to find hosts. This has been an eye opener for me. I now have a deeper appreciation for the challenge of hosting a VTR national. I'd like to say "thanks" to the folks (including the Roadster Factory) that make this happen every year whether I am able to physically attend or not. I think that one of the disconnects that we often forget is that membership on this list does not necessarily equate to being active in a local VTR chapter. Those of us not involved with VTR should probably all try to become more active in VTR and local VTR chapters (where possible). No matter where it is held, the VTR national convention is good for the long term survival of the Triumph marque in the US. -Greg Hutmacher |
Previous by Date: | RE: VTR 2004 Convention Update, Dave Massey |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Sheesh, Mark J. Bradakis |
Previous by Thread: | RE: VTR 2004 Convention Update, Dave Massey |
Next by Thread: | RE: VTR 2004 Convention Update, Joe Curry |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |