| To: | Joe Burlein <supertr6@earthlink.net> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [Fwd: 74 TR6] |
| From: | Joe Curry <Spitlist@gte.net> |
| Date: | Tue, 27 May 2003 16:53:52 -0700 |
| Cc: | Harlyred1@aol.com, lseidman@erols.com, triumphs@autox.team.net |
| References: | <140.125c4ce6.2c04d6c1@aol.com> <3ED3F66F.7060604@earthlink.net> from [68.0.191.62] at Tue, 27 May 2003 18:50:18 -0500 |
Joe Burlein wrote: > > Now has that ever been proven for a USA bank? A Bank Check is a Bank > Check. At least off a USA bank, you have to have funds in your account > to even get the Check to begin with. The Bank detects those funds > right then. > > Joe > A bank check "is" a bank check, except when it is a "Forged" bank check, then it is "toilet paper". Joe /// triumphs@autox.team.net mailing list /// or try http://www.team.net/cgi-bin/majorcool /// Archives at http://www.team.net/archive |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | RE: [Fwd: 74 TR6], Randall Young |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Moss Distributors, Dave Moag |
| Previous by Thread: | RE: [Fwd: 74 TR6], Randall Young |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [Fwd: 74 TR6], George Richardson |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |