triumphs
[Top] [All Lists]

RE: Sad ZSs vs SUs

To: "'Randall Young '" <ryoung@navcomtech.com>, "'triumphs@autox.team.net '" <triumphs@autox.team.net>
Subject: RE: Sad ZSs vs SUs
From: Mark Hooper <mhooper@pixelsystems.com>
Date: Thu, 6 Feb 2003 21:23:47 -0500
Randall:

Many people say that the SUs outperform the ZS, but I can't help it, I have
always preferred the look of the Zeniths. Aaargh power or beauty. I am going
to save my pennies and buy the triple ZS setup. Then I can have three new
characteristics:
1 - under performing
2 - under powered
3 - unoriginal

But polished up, it will look nice!

Mark

-----Original Message-----
From: Randall Young
To: triumphs@autox.team.net
Sent: 2/6/03 8:35 PM
Subject: RE: Sad Week

> For the TR250 ... Zenith-Stromberg's as per original or SU H6 ?

IMO, the original (no smog) TR250 ZS is a better carb than an SU H6;
unless
your motor is modified and then the superior selection of needles and
springs would tip in favor of the H6.  (Of course finding the right
needles
and springs is a bit of a black art, not commonly practiced today.)

However, the SU HS6 is better than both of them; more reliable, parts
available, flows better, etc.  I believe it was Kas Kastner that said
they
actually worked very slightly better than DCOEs ...

YMMV
Randall

///  triumphs@autox.team.net mailing list
///  or try  http://www.team.net/cgi-bin/majorcool
///  Archives at http://www.team.net/archive


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>