Oops, I just checked the Act again and found that it is a defence if:
"(a)that the action was not taken by the defendant with the intent of
enhancing the apparent value of the motor vehicle for the purpose of
sale, and (b) that the action was not taken by the defendant for any other
fraudulent purpose."
That makes much more sense. Sorry if I mislead anyone. All you New South
Welshmen feel fee to swap you speedos ;-)
Cheers,
Michael
63' TR4
Sydney, Australia
_________________________________________________________________
/// triumphs@autox.team.net mailing list
/// To unsubscribe send a plain text message to majordomo@autox.team.net
/// with nothing in it but
///
/// unsubscribe triumphs
///
/// or try http://www.team.net/cgi-bin/majorcool
|