To: | "Ptegler" <ptegler@gouldfo.com> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: vacuum advance/retard differences? Ha Ha! Zero! |
From: | David Massey <105671.471@compuserve.com> |
Date: | Wed, 26 Sep 2001 14:50:05 -0400 |
Cc: | "Barry Schwartz" <bschwart@pacbell.net>, "David Massey" <105671.471@compuserve.com>, "[unknown]" <triumphs@autox.team.net> |
Message text written by "Ptegler" >The only time an engine is at 'zero' efficiency is when you switch it OFF! You either have a 'working process' that has an efficiency index... or 'no process' at all. < Again, the purpose of an engine is propulsion. If the engine is not propelling the car it is producing no output. Efficiency is energy out divided by energy in. Dave /// triumphs@autox.team.net mailing list /// To unsubscribe send a plain text message to majordomo@autox.team.net /// with nothing in it but /// /// unsubscribe triumphs /// /// or try http://www.team.net/cgi-bin/majorcool |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: vacuum advance/retard differences?, David Massey |
---|---|
Next by Date: | RE: vacuum advance/retard differences?, Randall Young |
Previous by Thread: | Fw: vacuum advance/retard differences? Ha Ha! Zero!, Ptegler |
Next by Thread: | Re: vacuum advance/retard differences? Ha Ha! Zero!, Ptegler |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |