triumphs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Suspension Questions Again (longish reply)

To: Triumphs Mailing List <triumphs@autox.team.net>
Subject: Re: Suspension Questions Again (longish reply)
From: "Jim Muller" <jimmuller@pop.mail.rcn.net>
Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2001 20:31:47 -0400
Organization: Southern Rail
References: <3B8A7A36.30852.8F07F30@localhost>
I stand corrected!  There is indeed another way that I didn't think about.

Pete & Aprille Chadwell (collectively?) wrote:

> ...He said that he could adjust the castor by 
> adding/subtracting shims...

Shimming the front of an A-arm's pivot differently from the rear moves its 
outer end forward or backward.  So by moving the upper pivot one way and the 
lower pivot the other you do indeed change castor.  Of course, it also makes 
the pivot no longer parallel to the vehicle's longitudinal axis.  (I guess I 
was stuck on keeping them longitudinal.)

I can see is a minor downside to this.  With castor increased this way, 
suspension travel will move the upper ball joint forward and the trunnion 
backwards just a little as each A-arm moves away from horizontal.  So castor 
will decrease slightly with any suspension travel, and you will also get a 
bit of "pro-squat" instead of anti-squat!

We're splitting hairs on this one, I suspect.  If this keeps up I'm gonna' 
hafta' go out to the garage and start measuring arm lengths, and then pull 
out calculator and...and, aw forget it. :-)


Jim Muller
jimmuller@pop.rcn.com
'80 Spitfire (Percy)
'70 GT6+ (Nigel)

///  triumphs@autox.team.net mailing list
///  To unsubscribe send a plain text message to majordomo@autox.team.net
///  with nothing in it but
///
///     unsubscribe triumphs
///


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>