triumphs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: TR-250 lens

To: MICHAEL FRANCIS KUTKA <cpecod@mail.jhmi.edu>
Subject: Re: TR-250 lens
From: Pat Fischer <pfischer@unicom.net>
Date: Sat, 19 Feb 2000 15:30:48 -0600
Cc: TR List <triumphs@autox.team.net>
References: <Pine.GSO.4.10.10002181508160.4329-100000@welchlink>
Many thanks to all who replied both on the list and privately to my question 
about
the 250 lights/colors.  Some inconsistency, as summarized by Mike's answer 
below,
seems to be the favored opinion. I must be getting down to the small points of 
my
car's restoration if I'm thinking about this small stuff, and that's nice 
because
it's been a very long road!

Thanks again.

Pat Fischer
CD8200 (clear+amber/red)


MICHAEL FRANCIS KUTKA wrote:

> To all,
> To tell you the truth, I think that you could get clear or amber front lens
> and red/red or red/amber on the rears depending on the vagaries of those on
> the line. This may be related to the fact that differnet markets had subtle
> differences in their requirements when the cars were new. Triumph was afterall
> a world wide mark at one time....
> Mike Kutka CD-255 (amber+amber/red), CD-6434 (clear+red/red)


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
  • TR-250 lens, MICHAEL FRANCIS KUTKA
    • Re: TR-250 lens, Pat Fischer <=