On Fri, 31 Dec 1999, Brian Kemp wrote:
Brian - I'm cc'ing the triumphs lists because I want to be clear.
> When I have to grab the fender and lift so someone else can get the jack under
> the frame, that's a tad too low. When you need to drive the car on to some 2"
> high boards to get the jack under the frame, the car is too low.
If you say so. I just carry a 2 X 6 to drive onto... Also, my factory
jack works just fine to get the car up a bit to get the floor jack under
it. Also, in the plans is to get a special jack with only 2 inches ground
clearance needed.
There's more than one way to skin a cat.
> Other than that, TR6s where the frame is not parallel to the ground look
> stupid.
Umm - okay. I have no idea what you are referring to.
If this was my SUV reference, I'll qualify the statement - I've seen way
too many TR6's with the so-called heavy duty springs that are way too
high. Period. This is my opinion.
However, the reason that I don't like SUV imitation TR6's is that a
friend of mine rolled his TR6 - with the heavy duty springs and the SUV
stance.
Conclusion - too high.
That is all.
> Brian Kemp
> 72 TR6 - almost a tad to low.
Happy gnu year.
rml
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Bob Lang Room N42-140Q | This space for rent.
Consultant MIT Computer Services |
Voice: (617)253-7438 FAX: (617)258-9535 |
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|