triumphs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: maximum message length?

To: kehrlich@dyax.com, triumphs@autox.team.net
Subject: Re: maximum message length?
From: "Earl Smith" <earl56@hotmail.com>
Date: Wed, 26 May 1999 16:36:06 GMT
Keith
I don't know for sure but I'm getting mail from the list that was posted 
anywhere from 2 days ago to 3 weeks ago.Go figure.
Earl
75,76,&79 Spitfires

>From: kehrlich@dyax.com (Keith S. Ehrlich)
>Reply-To: kehrlich@dyax.com (Keith S. Ehrlich)
>To: triumphs@autox.team.net
>Subject: maximum message length?
>Date: Wed, 26 May 1999 10:32:22 -0400
>MIME-Version: 1.0
>From triumphs-owner@autox.team.net Wed May 26 09:23:06 1999
>Received: from [155.99.188.52] by hotmail.com (1.5) with SMTP id 
>MHotMailB9156AE90189D1B983189B63BC3406000; Wed May 26 09:23:06 1999
>Received: from localhost (daemon@localhost)by triumph.cs.utah.edu 
>(8.9.1/8.9.1) with SMTP id KAA12091;Wed, 26 May 1999 10:22:32 -0600 (MDT)
>Received: (from majordom@localhost)by triumph.cs.utah.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) id 
>KAA12060for triumphs-actors; Wed, 26 May 1999 10:22:24 -0600 (MDT)
>Organization: Dyax Corp
>but
>Sender: owner-triumphs@autox.team.net
>but
>
>Does anyone know if the list server rejects messages that exceed a
>certain size? I have submitted an admittedly long descriptive (part II
>of TR6 tube shock conversion test) twice this week but it has not shown
>up. There was no enclosure or other unusual stuff.
>
>A quick yes or no from a knowledgeable lister would be really helpful.
>
>Maybe the majordomo is telling me something here?? ;-)
>
>TIA
>
>Keith



<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>