triumphs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Head gasket change, (and other changes) Spitfire

To: Barry Schwartz <bschwart@pacbell.net>
Subject: Re: Head gasket change, (and other changes) Spitfire
From: Joe Curry <spitlist@gte.net>
Date: Wed, 04 Feb 1998 10:03:37 -0800
Cc: triumphs@Autox.Team.Net
Organization: Curry Enterprises
References: <34D8A69F.420F@pacbell.net>
Barry,
Regardless of whether or not you are correct, those points actually
"make sense".  It's certainly worth further investigation.

Joe Curry

Barry Schwartz wrote:
> 
> Maybe a little additional information about the changes would help.  In
> 1971 along with the body changes to the MK4 here in the states, the
> Block was changed to the big bearing 1296 motor, I assume to get ready
> for the 1500 increase. In 1972 the block was changed to the recessed
> head gasket variety.  Then in 1974 the stroke was increased to provide
> the 1493 increase.  There may have been a few late 71's with the
> recessed heads.  The rods from 71-on are the same (and by the way are
> the same rods as used on the later GT6 and TR6), and the rods for the
> MK3 and earlier are the same (for the most part).  The crankshaft is
> unique to the 71-72 model years(only to incorporate the bearing change,
> not the stroke change).  This much I know, the rest is speculation.  Now
> something has to be different from 71-72, and from 73 on, because you
> can't just put a 73 crank in using the same rods and pistons.  It stands
> to reason that if you increase the stroke by changing the throw on the
> crank to a longer one, AND NOTHING ELSE, (which is what appears to have
> happened, same pistons, and rods) the pistons would hit the head,
> because they are going farther up and down.  You also have to change the
> crank center to head deck height to accommodate the additional travel.
> The blocks from 71-72 are also unique to those models, and herein lies
> the catch.  These blocks have a  crank center to head deck surface for
> the 1296 engines, and the 1500 blocks have the additional increase from
> the crank centerline to head deck height for the stroke change.  So it
> appears that one cannot simply use a crankshaft from a 1500 in a big
> bearing 1296 to get a stroke increase.  I may be all wet here, because I
> haven’t actually measured these block’s and someone will correct me if
> I’m wrong I’m sure.-
> 
> Barry Schwartz (San Diego) bschwart@pacbell.net

-- 
"Thanks to the Interstate Highway System, it is now possible
 to travel across the country coast to coast without seeing
 anything." -- Charles Kuralt

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>