To: | John Peacock <pearesto@totcon.com> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: TR7 rear needed |
From: | "Harold O'Reilly" <continen@gnofn.org> |
Date: | Tue, 18 Nov 1997 09:02:54 -0800 (PST) |
Cc: | TR8 List <tr8@mercury.lcs.mit.edu>, Triumph List <triumphs@Autox.Team.Net> |
On Mon, 17 Nov 1997, John Peacock wrote: > I need a complete rear with all brake lines intact. I am not sure if the > 3.45 or 3.90 would be better for a 16v conversion. I would invite reasons > for which is better. Unless you are going dragracing the 3.45 would be better. The 3.90 would give better acceleration but the 16V engine will be a big boost in HP anyway. The 3.45 will give better gas mileage and lower revs at highway speeds. Harold O'Reilly New Orleans 1979 TR7 DHC 1976 Spitfire 1962 Thunderbird Sport Roadster |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: Rear Hub Bearings, Philip E. Barnes |
---|---|
Next by Date: | TR6 tidy up, Chris Habasinski |
Previous by Thread: | TR7 rear needed, John Peacock |
Next by Thread: | suspension bushes, derek evans |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |