To: | triumphs@Autox.Team.Net |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: Spitfire restoration |
From: | Dave Fain <KC3565L@sprintmail.com> |
Date: | Sun, 09 Nov 1997 09:56:40 -0700 |
Trevor Boicey wrote: >The Overriders were for insurance purposes, not safety. The >problem was that insurance rates were going through the roof >because an everyday little touch to the bumpers was costing >thousands to fix properly. > >The laws at the time were something to the effect of >"vehicle must withstand collision of X mph without sustaining >over $Y in damage" or something to that effect. > >The overriders allowed this. I thought it went without saying that Triumph bumpers are perfectly adequate as long as you don't actually bump anything. Dave Fain 1967 GT6 (bumpers for cosmetic purposes) |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | koni shocks, Gary Nafziger |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: Spitfire restoration, Dave Fain |
Previous by Thread: | Re: spitfire restoration, Rick deOlazarra |
Next by Thread: | Re: Spitfire restoration, Dave Fain |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |