To: | Malcolm Walker <walker05@camosun.bc.ca>, "triumphs@autox.team.net" <triumphs@Autox.Team.Net> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: Open vs. Closed Valve cover breather |
From: | Trevor Boicey <tboicey@brit.ca> |
Date: | Mon, 13 Oct 1997 22:41:50 -0400 |
Organization: | BRIT Inc |
References: | <Pine.OSF.3.95.971012101446.8588A-100000@ccins.camosun.bc.ca> |
Malcolm Walker wrote: > My chevette has a similar "draft tube" coming out of the valve cover and > going straight into the air cleaner. It enters after the element, so the > vapors are not filtered. It has to be there, since that is where the vacuum is high enough to do some good. The air filter is a restriction, and therefore there is a vacuum on the inside to "suck" air through it. I wouldn't worry about the filtering. As I have mentioned before, look at two cycle engines as far as burning oil this way goes. -- Trevor Boicey Ottawa, Canada tboicey@brit.ca http://www.brit.ca/~tboicey/ |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | The "Show Car" Ad, Sholtes IV |
---|---|
Next by Date: | CRAIG RICHBURG, Mark Stahlke |
Previous by Thread: | Re: Open vs. Closed Valve cover breather, Malcolm Walker |
Next by Thread: | Re: Open vs. Closed Valve cover breather, Malcolm Walker |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |