To: | James Charles Ruwaldt <jruwaldt@indiana.edu> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: '74 TR6 originality question |
From: | Trevor Boicey <tboicey@brit.ca> |
Date: | Wed, 23 Jul 1997 14:42:42 -0400 |
Cc: | triumphs@Autox.Team.Net |
Organization: | BRIT Inc. |
References: | <Pine.HPP.3.91.970723085208.26387B-100000@falstaff.ucs.indiana.edu> |
James Charles Ruwaldt wrote: > Starting that year, all cars sold in the U.S. were required to > have impact-absorbing bumpers. Just a further note. A lot of people think it's a "silly safety regulation" since rubber bumpers don't really help safety. However, it was actually more designed for insurance companies than safety. I guess the insurance companies were getting tired of paying out $700 for every parking lot 2mph oversight. Isn't the exact wording something like "Car must absorb 5mph impact with only superficial damage" or similar? -- Trevor Boicey Ottawa, Canada tboicey@brit.ca http://www.brit.ca/~tboicey/ |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | For Sale from Recycler, Tom Leake |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: VTR Nationals, Zink |
Previous by Thread: | Re: '74 TR6 originality question, James Charles Ruwaldt |
Next by Thread: | Re: '74 TR6 originality question, Andrew Mace |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |