triumphs
[Top] [All Lists]

RE: Spitfire 1500 engines<ECS9511150810F@elec.qmw.ac.uk>

To: Phil Willson <P.J.Willson@qmw.ac.uk>
Subject: RE: Spitfire 1500 engines<ECS9511150810F@elec.qmw.ac.uk>
From: "Richard Jackson - Network Technician ext. 2570"<RICHARD.JACKSON@nene.ac.uk>
Date: Wed, 15 Nov 1995 10:45:04 +0000 (GMT)
Cc: triumphs@autox.team.net, RICHARD.JACKSON@nene.ac.uk
>The 1500 engine is basically the same whatever car it came from.  It and the 
>2500 engine cannot be revved as
>hard as the smaller versions because they have a long stroke.  In general, if 
>the stroke is significantly longer than
>the bore, then it is not likely to be good at revving.  I can't remember the 
>precise figures, but the bore on all the
>engines is about 74 mm.  The stroke on the 1300 is a similar figure, but that 
>on the 1500/2500 is 90something.

Does this mean that if the bore is bigger than the stroke by a significant
amount it will rev it's nuts off.....:-)

Rich

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
  • RE: Spitfire 1500 engines<ECS9511150810F@elec.qmw.ac.uk>, Richard Jackson - Network Technician ext. 2570 <=