To: | Phil Willson <P.J.Willson@qmw.ac.uk> |
---|---|
Subject: | RE: Spitfire 1500 engines<ECS9511150810F@elec.qmw.ac.uk> |
From: | "Richard Jackson - Network Technician ext. 2570"<RICHARD.JACKSON@nene.ac.uk> |
Date: | Wed, 15 Nov 1995 10:45:04 +0000 (GMT) |
Cc: | triumphs@autox.team.net, RICHARD.JACKSON@nene.ac.uk |
>The 1500 engine is basically the same whatever car it came from. It and the >2500 engine cannot be revved as >hard as the smaller versions because they have a long stroke. In general, if >the stroke is significantly longer than >the bore, then it is not likely to be good at revving. I can't remember the >precise figures, but the bore on all the >engines is about 74 mm. The stroke on the 1300 is a similar figure, but that >on the 1500/2500 is 90something. Does this mean that if the bore is bigger than the stroke by a significant amount it will rev it's nuts off.....:-) Rich |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: Good mechanics<UPMAIL01.199511150747130448@msn.com>, Richard Jackson - Network Technician ext. 2570 |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: Good mechanics, Philip Searle |
Previous by Thread: | Re: Good mechanics<UPMAIL01.199511150747130448@msn.com>, Richard Jackson - Network Technician ext. 2570 |
Next by Thread: | My 2 cents on Synthetic oils, Sean Johnson |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |