Sorry to bomb the whole list with this, but Mr. Hesek's address is not
recognized by my server.
On Oct 4, 7:52am, Richard Hesek (432)-5414 wrote:
> Subject: Re: Verdict
> Mr. D. Perslow commented:
>
> "How odd that you post a message and apologize for it at the
> same time! Seems to me that if you're already sorry while
> you're posting you have the option of just not sending it,
> n'est-ce pas?"
>
> The apology pertained to the non-related subject not the
> message.
> The legal community believes that the U.S, justice system
> touches all of us, even the apathetic, and this trial demonstrated
> how the justice system may be failing at the hands of the
> ignorant and the apathetic.
> To be more specific about my apology I could add, I suppose,
> that I'm sorry "you" got the message.
>
> RWH
> concerned
>-- End of excerpt from Richard Hesek (432)-5414
I tend to agree with Dan, if you have to apologize for the non-LBC
content of your message, why bother sending it? Remember, this is
_not_ a US only forum.
Doug Mitchell - Already excessively tired of the OJ crap.
|