tigers
[Top] [All Lists]

[Tigers] Mark II VINs

To: Ron Fraser via Tigers <tigers@autox.team.net>
Subject: [Tigers] Mark II VINs
From: snakebit289 via Tigers <tigers@autox.team.net>
Date: Thu, 14 Jul 2016 19:23:54 +0000 (UTC)
Delivered-to: mharc@autox.team.net
Delivered-to: tigers@autox.team.net
References: <624034641.3302356.1468524234718.JavaMail.yahoo.ref@mail.yahoo.com>
--===============4487967850108864469==
        boundary="----=_Part_3302355_1845337411.1468524234714"

------=_Part_3302355_1845337411.1468524234714
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

There's a solitary listing for a Mark II with VIN starting with 001, and then 
the next viable production VIN starts with 100, one reason why the last 
production VIN is 633, but the most quoted production number, excluding PP 
cars, was 533 Mark IIs built.

------=_Part_3302355_1845337411.1468524234714
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

<html><head></head><body><div style="color:#000; background-color:#fff; 
font-family:bookman old style, new york, times, serif;font-size:16px"><div 
id="yui_3_16_0_1_1468523216136_8024">There's a solitary listing for a Mark II 
with VIN starting with 001, and then the next viable production VIN starts with 
100, one reason why the last production VIN is 633, but the most quoted 
production number, excluding PP cars, was 533 Mark IIs built.</div><div 
id="yui_3_16_0_1_1468523216136_8162"><br></div></div></body></html>
------=_Part_3302355_1845337411.1468524234714--

--===============4487967850108864469==
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

_______________________________________________

tigers@autox.team.net

Archive: http://www.team.net/archive
Unsubscribe: http://autox.team.net/mailman/options/tigers/mharc@autox.team.net



--===============4487967850108864469==--

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>