tigers
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [Tigers] 2-post versus 4-post Lifts

To: lwright@impactoffice.com, tigers@autox.team.net
Subject: Re: [Tigers] 2-post versus 4-post Lifts
From: CoolVT--- via Tigers <tigers@autox.team.net>
Date: Fri, 29 Jan 2016 15:38:37 -0500
Delivered-to: mharc@autox.team.net
Delivered-to: tigers@autox.team.net
Full-name: CoolVT
--===============5692827135976774035==

--part1_2ed4b4.7d0e48c1.43dd27cd_boundary
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Figure a Tiger at 2500 lbs. on a 9000lb rated lift.  Should be pretty  
secure. The guy who installed mine said they are actually tested at twice  the 
rated capacity. I think as long as the Tiger isn't shaken off the lift then  
it's a pretty good bet that the lift won't collapse. 
Mark L
 
 
In a message dated 1/29/2016 3:13:28 P.M. Eastern Standard Time,  
tigers@autox.team.net writes:

I'm sure all the West-coasters have been through it all before and  shrug 
it off, but I was a couple of miles from home when I experienced our one  
significant earthquake, eh, 5 years ago -- and the first thing I thought of  
was the Tiger sitting on the lift in the garage. Came home, opened the door,  
all was well. 4-post lift. MAYBE someone can convince me that a 2-post is as 
 stable under such circumstances...

Larry Wright
Seabrook,  MD
_______________________________________________

tigers@autox.team.net

Archive:  http://www.team.net/archive
Forums:  http://www.team.net/forums
Unsubscribe:  http://autox.team.net/mailman/options/tigers/coolvt@aol.com




--part1_2ed4b4.7d0e48c1.43dd27cd_boundary
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META content=3D"text/html; charset=3DUS-ASCII" http-equiv=3DContent-Type>
<META name=3DGENERATOR content=3D"MSHTML 11.00.9600.18163"></HEAD>
<BODY id=3Drole_body style=3D"FONT-SIZE: 12pt; FONT-FAMILY: Arial; COLOR:=
 #000000"=20
bottomMargin=3D7 leftMargin=3D7 rightMargin=3D7 topMargin=3D7><FONT id=3Dr=
ole_document=20
color=3D#000000 size=3D3 face=3DArial>
<DIV>Figure a Tiger at 2500 lbs. on a 9000lb rated lift.&nbsp; Should be=
 pretty=20
secure.&nbsp;The guy who installed mine said they are actually tested at=
 twice=20
the rated capacity. I think as long as the Tiger isn't shaken off the lift=
 then=20
it's a pretty good bet that the lift won't collapse. </DIV>
<DIV>Mark L</DIV>
<DIV>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV>
<DIV>In a message dated 1/29/2016 3:13:28 P.M. Eastern Standard Time,=20
tigers@autox.team.net writes:</DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE=20
style=3D"PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: blue 2px solid"=
><FONT=20
  style=3D"BACKGROUND-COLOR: transparent" color=3D#000000 size=3D2 face=3D=
Arial>&nbsp;=20
  &nbsp; I'm sure all the West-coasters have been through it all before an=
d=20
  shrug it off, but I was a couple of miles from home when I experienced=
 our one=20
  significant earthquake, eh, 5 years ago -- and the first thing I thought=
 of=20
  was the Tiger sitting on the lift in the garage. Came home, opened the=
 door,=20
  all was well. 4-post lift. MAYBE someone can convince me that a 2-post=
 is as=20
  stable under such circumstances...<BR><BR>Larry Wright<BR>Seabrook,=20
  MD<BR>_______________________________________________<BR><BR>tigers@auto=
x.team.net<BR><BR>Donate:=20
  http://www.team.net/donate.html<BR>Archive:=20
  http://www.team.net/archive<BR>Forums:=20
  http://www.team.net/forums<BR>Unsubscribe:=20
  http://autox.team.net/mailman/options/tigers/coolvt@aol.com<BR><BR><BR><=
/FONT></BLOCKQUOTE></DIV></FONT></BODY></HTML>
--part1_2ed4b4.7d0e48c1.43dd27cd_boundary--

--===============5692827135976774035==
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

_______________________________________________

tigers@autox.team.net

Archive: http://www.team.net/archive
Unsubscribe: http://autox.team.net/mailman/options/tigers/mharc@autox.team.net



--===============5692827135976774035==--

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>