Agreed. As cool as it would be to have a 'one-of-a-small-number' Tiger, the
evidence as compiled by Norm and others that have done research based on
factory records goes against five-bolt 289's ever being installed at the
factory.
Besides, if it was a 'special' Tiger, I'd probably have to worry about keeping
it stock and stuff. Having it be the Tiger in my garage is special enough for
me.
Theo
> -----Original Message-----
> From: tigers-bounces@autox.team.net [mailto:tigers-
> bounces@autox.team.net] On Behalf Of rande
> Sent: January 23, 2011 1:20 PM
> To: tigers@autox.team.net
> Subject: [Tigers] 289's in Mark 1's
>
> I think it's likely that the RM Clarke book was in error.
>
> According to Norm Millers book, the third and final 260 order would
> have exceeded
> the total production of Mark 1A's, and hypothetically it would be more
> likely
> for Mark II's to begin assembly with 260's than the other way around.
>
> As far as the parts catalogue goes, Mark I and Mark II bellhousings are
> two
> different part numbers, with no I.D. number exceptions, and the same
> goes for
> Mark I and II blocks, two different part numbers, again, no I.D.
> exceptions
> and no "when using this replacement part, must also use..." further
> notations.
>
>
> RB
> _______________________________________________
> Tigers@autox.team.net
> Donate: http://www.team.net/donate.html
> Archive: http://www.team.net/archive
> Forums: http://www.team.net/forums
> Unsubscribe/Manage:
> http://autox.team.net/mailman/options/tigers/theo.smit@dynastream.com
>
This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential material for the sole
use of the intended recipient. If you are not the intended recipient, please
be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of this e-mail or
any attachment is prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error,
please contact the sender and delete all copies.
Thank you for your cooperation.
_______________________________________________
Tigers@autox.team.net
Donate: http://www.team.net/donate.html
Archive: http://www.team.net/archive
Forums: http://www.team.net/forums
|