tigers
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [Tigers] Yearly Confusion

To: tigers@autox.team.net
Subject: Re: [Tigers] Yearly Confusion
From: AAAGLASSS@aol.com
Date: Sun, 31 Jan 2010 15:15:45 EST
If I found a Tiger with lost paper work and had to re-title it would it be  
a 2010?? I'll stick with Norms list of #'s.
 
 
In a message dated 1/31/2010 10:12:00 A.M. Pacific Standard Time,  
drmayf@mayfco.com writes:

Jeff,  mine also. Born in October 1964, sold and titled in 1966 in 
Ventura,  Ca.  It is a 1966 according to them. Mine was also titled as a 
Rootes  Roadster.. subesequent moves to other states had that  
corrected.   Reckon our cars are littermates? ....1136 is  mine...

mayf
Jeffrey Nichols wrote:

>All this talk of what  year Tiger you may have seems  academic because 
Rootes
>didn't have  model years like other car makers did (or do).  Rootes only  
built
>and sold MKI and MKII Tigers with no model year  designation.  On Facebook
>there is a Sunbeam Tiger page (161  members and growing) with a copy of a 
Tiger
>invoice and no model year  is listed.
>The DMV  title for my car has it as a 1966 Rootes  Roadster and  my car was
>built in October of 1964.  I suppose  there are 1969 MKII Tigers out there 
if
>other DMVs operate with the  same logic.  
> 
> In  Michigan you can put period  license plates on a old car as long as 
the
>plates match the year on the  title.  So my car has 1966 Michigan license
>plates even though it  was built in 1964.   
> 
> 
>          Jeff
>_______________________________________________
You are subscribed as  aaaglasss@aol.com

Tigers@autox.team.net
http://autox.team.net/mailman/listinfo/tigers

http://www.team.net/archive
_______________________________________________
Support Team.Net  http://www.team.net/donate.html


Tigers@autox.team.net
http://autox.team.net/mailman/listinfo/tigers

http://www.team.net/archive

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>