Russ,
I agree with John Logan. I have the "wide" (not) ratio transmission and
the original 2.88 rear end. Very satisfying on street or highway, and
the Salisbury version of the LAT-34 Dana. Salisbury is owned by Dana,
and the Jaguar LSD mounts the original 2.88 ring gears.
Use the free Excel Transmission Calculator written by Bob Hokanson,
available at:
http://www.tigersunited.com/techtips/HokansonGearSpeedXL/pt-HokansonGearSpeedXL.asp
<http://www.tigersunited.com/techtips/HokansonGearSpeedXL/pt-HokansonGearSpeedXL.asp>
Recommeded for anybody thinking of mucking around with transmission, rear end,
or tire sizes.
Steve
___
Steve Laifman
Editor - TigersUnited.com
<http://tigersunited.com>
Russ and Tammy C. wrote:
<http://www.tigersunited.com/techtips/HokansonGearSpeedXL/pt-HokansonGearSpeedXL.asp>
> I am going to run a ford motor sport 345 horse in my 65........would I still
>be happy with the close ratio transmission or should I change it to wide
>ratio? Street use only. Anybody have thoughts? Thanks, Russ
_______________________________________________
Support Team.Net http://www.team.net/donate.html
Tigers@autox.team.net
http://autox.team.net/mailman/listinfo/tigers
http://www.team.net/archive
|