tigers
[Top] [All Lists]

timing advance

To: "Tiger List" <tigers@autox.team.net>
Subject: timing advance
From: "Tigerman" <Tigerman67@hotmail.com>
Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2007 15:23:09 -0700
I remember a couple of threads on here concerning timing advance & timing 
curves, so I thought I would consult the collective wisdom.

I am starting to play with the advance curve on my mustang and when finished 
and happy with the results, I will try to replicate on my tiger too.

I am about to replace the springs in the distributor to see what difference 
in the advance curve I will get.  So I made a chart of my initial factory 
advance at various rpm's and found that I was 'all in' mechanical around 
3500 rpm.  Based on what I have read, I want that to be closer to 2500-3000 
for better performance.  I will have to see how big of a difference the 
springs make.

But on to my real question, as well as checking my mechanical advance, I 
also checked my vacuum advance, and found I was getting very little from the 
vacuum advance.  While I realize this is more about fuel economy at cruise 
speed, it would be nice to get a feel for what an appropriate amount of 
advance would be for the vacuum advance and at what vacuum it should be 
applied at.  Any guidance?  I thought I remember reading once that 20 
degrees of vacuum advance was about right, but that is significantly more 
than the 8 degrees additional I have now at 15lbs (and more realistically, 
my engine probably makes more like 12lbs of vacuum in the real world, which 
would only be 5 degrees additional advance).

So what do you guys think?

Thanks,
Steve




<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>