RE: Re: Chrysler & the Tiger

["Stu Brennan" <stubrennan@comcast.net>]

OK, so we have a company that was not wildly profitable (otherwise it
would probably not have been for sale), a model that was not selling in
large numbers, which was powered by a competitor's engine, which was
going to have to be redesigned to meet the '68 regs.  And, I believe I
read somewhere that in the same period Rootes was investing in a new
sedan factory, which had much more promise of future income.  So, with
all that, is it any wonder that the Tiger got flushed?

Stu