tigers
[Top] [All Lists]

RE: Fuel mileage, distributors, etc.

To: "'Theodore Brown'" <tbrown@midcoast.com>, <tigers@Autox.Team.Net>
Subject: RE: Fuel mileage, distributors, etc.
From: " Ron Fraser" <rfraser@bluefrog.biz>
Date: Wed, 22 Dec 2004 10:56:54 -0500
Theo
        I refer you to one of my favorite articles; " Timing is Everything
".
http://www.fordmuscle.com/archives/2000/03/timing/index.shtml

This will guide you through the workings of the distributor and it will give
you a total advance vs compression ratio.
Excellent article, IMO.

Ron Fraser

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-tigers@Autox.Team.Net [mailto:owner-tigers@Autox.Team.Net] On
Behalf Of Theodore Brown
Sent: Wednesday, December 22, 2004 12:32 AM
To: tigers@Autox.Team.Net
Subject: Fuel mileage, distributors, etc.


Hello All:
I noticed a comment by Theo in the discussion of obtaining better mileage 
with our cars about using vacuum advance on a distributor.  I had, for a 
long time, a Mallory dual-point distributor on my car.  It had only a 
mechanical advance on it.  A couple of years ago, when I had the engine 
rebuilt, I converted the old Mallory to a Petronix setup, still with just 
the mechanical advance.  I don't drive my car a whole lot, and don't pay 
much attention to fuel mileage, but am now wondering if I should be using a 
vacuum advance as well.  I think I understand why vacuum advance is good 
for economy, but I would appreciate it if someone would explain it once 
again.  If converting over to a mechanical/vacuum advance setup is 
desireable, what would be the easiest (i.e. cheapest) way?  The rest of my 
ignition system is stock.  Thanks again, as always, for any input. Tod
B382002384LRXFE

Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
Version: 7.0.296 / Virus Database: 265.6.2 - Release Date: 12/20/2004
 

-- 
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
Version: 7.0.296 / Virus Database: 265.6.2 - Release Date: 12/20/2004





<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>