Gary,
You seem to have a very short memory. I remind you of your recent post on
the subject:
bob_diehl
>From: GSFuqua1@aol.com
>Date: Mon, 26 May 2003 00:33:46 EDT
>Subject: Re: Mk II ebay Tiger
>To: wittsend@jps.net, tigers@autox.team.net
>X-Mailer: 8.0 for Windows sub 6011
>X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: from multipart/alternative by demime 0.99d.1
>X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: Alternative section used was text/plain
>Sender: owner-tigers@autox.team.net
>Reply-To: GSFuqua1@aol.com
>
>
>At the risk of starting a fire storm and being flamed off the list I would
>comment that not every Tiger Mk II that is put up for sale is a fake or being
>sold by someone looking to take advantage of some poor unsuspecting buyer.
>Frankly, if you are in the market for a Mk II Tiger then you ought to know
>what to
>look for. Also just because it is not listed in Norman's book or TAC'd does
>not mean it is not a real Mk II.
>
>Sometimes I think we get a little too paranoid for our own good. I wonder if
>we are doing ourselves and our cars a service or disservice by questioning
>the authenticity of ever car that is put up for sale. Could be that we are
>holding our own values down because of the skepticism we create around the
>cars.
>Obviously these are just my own opinions which, last time I looked, we were
>all free to express.
>
>If you are interested in the car and it does look nice, then just send the
>man a note and ask him the usual questions rather than second guessing his
>intentions or integrity on the list.
|