tigers
[Top] [All Lists]

IFS/IRS question

To: "tigers@autox.team.net" <tigers@autox.team.net>
Subject: IFS/IRS question
From: sosnaenergyconsulting <sosnaenergyconsulting@cox.net>
Date: Mon, 12 May 2003 20:37:00 -0700
Hi:
I recently bought a copy of Fred Puhn's book "How to Make your Car 
Handle" and had a question for y'all on the list.

Don't have the book handy, but there's a section where he shows (using 
an early Lotus as an example) how the independent FRONT suspension of a 
car that was designed for large diameter tires (I think he used 26" for 
the example) will change when smaller diameter tires and wheels (I 
believe the example used 22")are used.  The lower control arm, which is 
designed to be more or less level when using the larger tires becomes 
angled when using smaller tires.  This causes the roll center to rise. 
I'm nutshelling here.

Question #1 is this: Wouldn't the same principle apply to an independent 
REAR suspension?

If the answer to the above question is Yes, then question #2 (ignoring 
the front suspension which WAS designed for the smaller diameter wheels 
and tires being currently used) is: would lowering the car at the rear 
compensate for the higher rear roll center caused by using the smaller 
diameter tires and wheels in the first place?

And lastly, if the answer to the second question is Yes, my final (if 
you believe that I have a bridge to sell you :-) ) question is: would 
lowering the car now cause the lower rear lower control arms to become 
more level?

Okay, on re-reading this, I came up with question #4: If the answer to 
question #2 is "no", or if lowering the car is not an option is it 
possible to compensate for the higher rear roll center in some other 
way, such as a stiffer rear anti-roll bar (possibly upgrading the front 
bar also in order to balance things)?

Thanks in advance for any help you folks can give me.

Regards

David (perpetually confused) Sosna

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>