>
> Guys,
> The sad truth is that there ARE volvos out there that are faster (and
> quicker) than a stock Tiger. They SHOULD be, with 30 years of developement.
> But the truth is this: the stock Tiger is about as fast as the early 240Z;
> not a road burner today.
> So what (to quote the pres)?
> The cars can be MADE to quickly go fast, they have period charm, they are a
> sight less expensive than the cheapest volvo....in short they are FUN!
> Forget the swedemobiles with the latin name....I've got enough shoe boxes
> in the closet.
> Regards,
> Ray
And which is the most fun to drive? A Volvo (with any exotic name), a
240Z or a Tiger?
|