Enough already!!
Grown men bickering...via E-mail!!!
Stop the madness!!!
Please?!
8^)
Forwarded message:
_________________________________________________________________
Date: Wed, 22 Oct 1997 12:00 -0400 (EDT)
From: nicholsj@oakwood.org
To: <ktisdale@ix.netcom.com>
CC: <tigers@autox.team.net>,
<LeBrun@hii.hitachi.com>
Sender: owner-tigers@autox.team.net
Reply-To: nicholsj@oakwood.org
Subject: Re[2]: Classic Cars ?
'1) A seeming honest request for the URL was made - what's the beef?'
Sorry, it didn't seem honest to me. I took it to be sarcastic.
Excuse me.
'2) Did you e-mail the URL to all of us?'
Sure did. It was a while back and included several other URLs of interest.
'3) The URL listed below doesn't work.'
It works for me. The URL takes me to the index page of Classic Cars buyers
checklist.
_____'4) Free info is just that - some, however, will get it right.'
My apologies if the info I provide is wrong. I'm sure you'll do better.
'5) Good manners will always take one further than "snideness"....'
Couldn't agree more.
________ Reply Separator _________________________________
Subject: Re: Classic Cars ?
Author: Ken Tisdale <ktisdale@ix.netcom.com> at INTERNET
Date: 10/21/97 6:16 PM
I respectfully suggest that before you "turn on the flames", that you
consider:
1) A seeming honest request for the URL was made - what's the beef?
2) Did you e-mail the URL to all of us?
3) The URL listed below doesn't work.
4) Free info is just that - some, however, will get it right.
5) Good manners will always take one further than "snideness"....
nicholsj@oakwood.org wrote:
>
>
> If you don't have internet access the url is useless. If you do have
> access, a quick search is easy using one of the search engines(Lycos,
> Excite, AOLNetFind, etc.) Maybe you deleted the email I sent with
> this info. Since you apparently lack the ability to search, here it
> is:
>
> www.erack.com/car/_classcarmain.htm
>
> I hope this meets your rigorous standard of quality information.
>
> Jeff
>
> P.S. As a "customer" in your "private" life(whatever the hell that
means),
> you get what you pay for, don't like it, don't read it.
>
> ______________________________ Reply Separator
_________________________________
> Subject: Classic Cars ?
> Author: <LeBrun@hii.hitachi.com> at INTERNET
> Date: 10/21/97 12:52 PM
>
> -For those of us without www access, more specific info. would be
> appreciated, than a seemingly blow-off "try the web".
>
> -Even in our "private" lives we're all "customers" and deserve quality
> information.
>
> Phil
>
>
>
>
>
> Try 'Practical Classics' for November, or check out Classic Cars
> website for a reprint of their Tiger article of a few months back.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> I was just looking at the November issue of Classic Cars - I thought
> someone mentioned on here that Tigers were mentioned in one of the
> articles - which article???
>
> Thanks.
>
>
>
--
Ken Tisdale Sr. Sales Engineer
Pulsecom 303-403-1968
ktisdale@ix.netcom.com FAX: 303-432-8967
ken.tisdale@pulse.com
|