Re: NOS vs REPRO

To:	lrw@aop.com
Subject:	Re: NOS vs REPRO
From:	"G.S.Sutherland" <G.S.Sutherland@phil.hull.ac.uk>
Date:	Thu, 25 Jul 1996 12:02:29 +0100 (BST)

+ Considering he doesn't have a cowl, what body part (or how many
+ body parts) get changed before he won't pass TAC as he's not Carroll
+ Shelby anymore?

        Actually, we're going to have to be careful: Someone might 
restore the removed parts, and use them to build a reproduction Shelby, 
and claim it to be origional...:)

+ Larry Wright, Maryland     "I can't get no-- Satis-traction"

                Graeme

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
Re: NOS vs REPRO, (continued) Re: NOS vs REPRO, Roland Dudley RE: NOS vs REPRO, Les McClelland, x4526 Re[2]: NOS vs REPRO, LeBrun RE: Re[2]: NOS vs REPRO, Spontelli, Ramon Re: NOS vs REPRO, Frank Marrone Re[2]: NOS vs REPRO, LeBrun NOS vs Repro, STEVEN M. METCALFE RE: NOS vs REPRO, Richard Atherton (Entex) RE: NOS vs REPRO, Roland Dudley RE: NOS vs REPRO, LARRY WRIGHT Re: NOS vs REPRO, G.S.Sutherland <= Re: NOS vs REPRO, Steven Laifman Re: NOS vs REPRO, lallegrucci Re: NOS vs REPRO, G.S.Sutherland

Previous by Date:	A Superior Message, LARRY WRIGHT
Next by Date:	Sun Visor Brackets, Steven Semeraro, ATR, (202) 514-8374
Previous by Thread:	RE: NOS vs REPRO, LARRY WRIGHT
Next by Thread:	Re: NOS vs REPRO, Steven Laifman
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]