Mike, I fear that you're already slipping as H,DRD. I've edited your
missive, to aid and instruct in how official DRD communiques should be
structured.
At 07:50 AM 1/22/98 -0500, you wrote:
>Dear Doug:
>As the newly and recently appointed head and leader of the Department of
Redundancy Department I, Mike Rosen,
>feel it my duty and obligation, in my official role and capacity, to point
out (indicate, so to speak) the correct and official
>name of this vital, critical link in the path and chain of obsfucation and
unclarifed communication.
>
>Your letter/missive to this agency will be kept on file, in both a filing
cabinet and a computer file, until such a time as it
>is well and truly noted that you can apply the appellation Department
>twice.
>
>The singular, non-repetitive use of Department denotes a certain, dare I
say, lack of
>understanding of the duties and responsibilities weighing on my broad
shoulders.
>
>Might I suggest you read the classic epitome of Canadian literature, Jacob Two
>Two... it will set you on the correct path of redemption.
>
>I remain,
>yours truly,
>Mike (two kill switches within easy reach) Rosen
>Head Department Chief, Department of Redundancy Department
Remember, in the DRD, overkill just isn't enough!
Brian
BTW, are you still looking for an aluminium flywheel? Mine might become
available...
>
|