spridgets
[Top] [All Lists]
<prev [Date] next>
[Advanced]
 <prev [Thread] next>

Re: 1275 vs 1500 in a RB Midget

from [Unknown] [Permanent Link][Original]
To: Frank Clarici <spritenut@comcast.net>
Subject: Re: 1275 vs 1500 in a RB Midget
Date: Wed, 4 Jan 2006 18:49:40 -0800
Cc: Spridget List <spridgets@autox.team.net>
References: <20060104140703.EFTN1595.tomts46-srv.bellnexxia.net@[209.226.175.82]> <e018d8dec3e95d073038efe15f1bd30e@ocotillofield.net> <43BC8753.4010302@comcast.net> 
Not as much as these were. "Dive, dive ... aaoogaa... aaoogaa!"

The car had had a collision.

On Jan 4, 2006, at 6:41 PM, Frank Clarici wrote:

> Um, those front beams are supposed to be curved a little.
[More with this subject...]
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Previous by Date:  Re: 1275 vs 1500 in a RB Midget, Unknown
Next by Date:  Re: 1275 vs 1500 in a RB Midget, Unknown
Previous by Thread:  Re: 1275 vs 1500 in a RB Midget, Unknown
Next by Thread:  Re: 1275 vs 1500 in a RB Midget, Unknown
Indexes:  [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]