| To: | type79@ix.netcom.com |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Ebay Sellers--an shill bidding |
| Date: | Fri, 18 Nov 2005 16:09:25 -0800 |
| Cc: | spridgets@autox.team.net |
| Domainkey-signature: | a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=dk20050327; d=earthlink.net; b=T8Q8kepInGSGHt9z2+XtIP4SePzXJkc7z7AqO6ZybpG+Hk2pUPRmg55WvPk2Am1Z; h=Received:Message-ID:Date:From:User-Agent:X-Accept-Language:MIME-Version:To:CC:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:Content-Type:X-ELNK-Trace:X-Originating-IP; |
| References: | <486360.1132346419591.JavaMail.root@elwamui-rubis.atl.sa.earthlink.net> |
| User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030624 Netscape/7.1 (ax) |
Jay wrote: >Personally, I see the hiding of bidder's identities as deceiving > The biggest problem with hiding is in how it makes it impossible to determine shill bidding. If I am going to bid on a an item of significant value (over a dime), I want to be able to look at the history of bidders in a seller's other auction. If I see someone who is consistently bidding on a seller's auctions, but never winning, I can be pretty confident that there is shill bidding going on. This is particularly true if I look at a bidder's history and find the same seller bidding on HIS items! This, I suspect, has taken place more in art, antique, and higher value collectible auctions. In any event, I tend to steer clear of any auctions that have hidden bidders. Buster Evans |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Ebay Sellers rain.CC.Lehigh.EDU, Unknown |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Time to buy a Chrysler?, Unknown |
| Previous by Thread: | Time to buy a Chrysler?, Unknown |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Ebay Sellers--an shill bidding, Unknown |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |