| To: | PilotRob@webtv.net (Robert E. Shlafer), clabaw@jpl.nasa.gov (Clayton La Baw) |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Tube Shock Conversion? - definitive comparison |
| Date: | Thu, 16 Aug 2001 09:32:18 -0700 |
| Cc: | mikeg@vicnet.net.au (Mike & Kerry Gigante), type79@ix.netcom.com, spridgets@autox.team.net |
| References: | <Clayton La Baw <clabaw@jpl.nasa.gov> |
Bob -
Follow-up to earlier: I started with the tubes set to zero, and dialed
them up until I could negotiate my "test section" (a severe diagonal dip in
the I-210 freeway that provokes the dreaded "Austin wriggle" in stock lever
suspensions) without "sashay". Ended up at level 7 as softest
acceptable. A Watts link (in the future) should allow a softer setting.
Clay L.
'67 Sprite
>Clay-
>
>Happy with rear "Spax" ride under normal
>road driving (assuming you also use car
>in this fashion?), or too stiff, or---------?
>
>
>
>
>Cap'n. Bob
> '61 :{)
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Soft topsx-mac-creator="4D4F5353" 2001 07:27:49 -0500, Unknown |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Tube Shock Conversion? ( wierd ) of Thu, 16 Aug 2001 07:01:35 -0400, Unknown |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Tube Shock Conversion? - definitive comparison, Unknown |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Tube Shock Conversion? - definitive comparison, Unknown |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |