To: | Lancer7676@aol.com |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: Was Supertrapp--Now a Challenge! |
From: | David Christman <dpc@ai.mit.edu> |
Date: | Thu, 7 Oct 1999 14:41:51 -0400 (EDT) |
Cc: | Spridgets@autox.team.net |
In-reply-to: | <0.74bc6c6a.252d10bb@aol.com> (Lancer7676@aol.com) |
Reply-to: | David Christman <dpc@ai.mit.edu> |
Sender: | owner-spridgets@autox.team.net |
Think of an exhuast pulse (one puff af exhuast from one cylinder) flowing down a pipe. Behind the pusle is an area of low pressure (relative to the pulse high pressure) created in/by the wake of the pulse. This low pressure helps suck the next pulse out and is called scavanging. If the pipe is to small it restricts the flow of the pulse (slowing it down). If the pipe is to large the pressure of the pusle dissipates and there is no scavanging. I would suspect the stock exhaust size is pretty close to correct as the original engineers knew about this issue. They did make compromises in the exhuast manifold (for cost, longevity, etc.) so a set of headers will help performance. |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Web midget for sale., Elliott, Patrick |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: Was Supertrapp--Now a Challenge!, Ron Soave |
Previous by Thread: | Was Supertrapp--Now a Challenge!, Lancer7676 |
Next by Thread: | Re: Was Supertrapp--Now a Challenge!, Ron Soave |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |