spridgets
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Fw: Email

To: "Spridgets" <spridgets@autox.team.net>
Subject: Re: Fw: Email
From: "Robert Duquette" <RobertDuquette@Sympatico.ca>
Date: Fri, 11 Jun 1999 07:42:50 -0400
Reply-to: "Robert Duquette" <RobertDuquette@Sympatico.ca>
Sender: owner-spridgets@autox.team.net
But, is this true or just someone's idea of a hoax?

-----Original Message-----
From: toyman@htcomp.net <toyman@htcomp.net>
To: spridgets@autox.team.net <spridgets@autox.team.net>
Date: June 10, 1999 5:48 PM
Subject: Fwd: Fw: Email


>Please forgive me for doing this but as this affects everyone on this list
I
>wanted to pass this along (flame me if you must,be merciful,my wife washed
my
>asbestos suit and it should have been dry cleaned)Brad
>
> >Subject: Email
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>Subject:
>> >>        Fw: Email and the USPS
>> >>   Date:
>> >>        Mon, 31 May 1999 14:16:11 -0500
>> >>   From:
>> >>        gluck@itexas.net (gluck@itexas.net)
>> >>
>> >>Please read the following carefully if you intend to stay online and
>> >>continue using email: The last few months have revealed an
>> >>alarming trend in the Government of the United States attempting
>> >>to quietly push through legislation that will affect your use of the
>> >>Internet.  Under proposed legislation the U.S. Postal Service will
>> >>be attempting to bilk email users out of "alternate postage fees".
>> >>Bill 602P will permit the Federal Govt to charge a 5 cent surcharge
>> >>on every email delivered, by billing Internet Service Providers at
>> >>source.  The consumer would then be billed in turn by the ISP.
>> >>Washington D.C. lawyer Richard Stepp is working without pay to
>> >>prevent this legislation from becoming law.
>> >>
>> >>The U.S. Postal Service is claiming that lost revenue due to the
>> >>proliferation of email is costing nearly $230,000,000 in revenue per
>> >>year.  You may have noticed their recent ad campaign "There is
>> >>nothing like a letter".  Since the average citizen received about 10
>> >>pieces of email per day in 1998, the cost to the typical individual
>> >>would be an additional 50 cents per day, or over $180 dollars per
>> >>year, above and beyond their regular Internet costs.  Note that
>> >>this would be money paid directly to the U.S. Postal Service for a
>> >>service they do not even provide.  The whole point of the Internet
>> >>is democracy and non-interference.  If the federal government is
>> >>permitted to tamper with our liberties by adding a surcharge to
>> >>email, who knows where it will end.  You are already paying an
>> >>exorbitant price for snail mail because of bureaucratic efficiency.
>> >>It currently takes up to 6 days for a letter to be delivered
>> >>from New York to Buffalo.
>> >>
>> >>If the U.S. Postal Service is allowed to tinker with email, it will
>> >>mark the end of the "free" Internet in the United States.   One
>> >>congressman, Tony Schnell (r) has even suggested a "twenty to
>> >>forty dollar per month surcharge on all Internet service" above
>> >>and beyond the government's proposed email charges.  Note that
>> >>most of the major newspapers have ignored the story, the only
>> >>exception being the Washingtonian which called the idea of email
>> >>1999 Editorial.   Don't sit by and watch your freedoms erode away!
>> >>
>> >>Send this e-mail to EVERYONE on your list, and tell all your
>> >>friends and relatives to write to their congressman and say
>> >>"No!"  to  Bill 602P.   It will only take a few moments of your time,
>> >>and could very well be instrumental in killing a bill we don't want.
>> >>
>> >>Kate Turner
>> >>Assistant to Richard Stepp, Berger, Stepp and Gorman
>> >>Attorneys at Law 216 Concorde Street, Vienna, VA
>> >>
>> >>Mike
>> >
>>
>
>
>


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>