| To: | Jeff Boatright <jboatri@emory.edu> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: mechanical advance |
| From: | Ulix Goettsch <ulix@u.washington.edu> |
| Date: | Wed, 26 May 1999 22:47:50 -0700 (PDT) |
| Cc: | spridgets@autox.team.net |
| In-reply-to: | <l03110704b3721ff22fef@[170.140.244.186]> |
| Reply-to: | Ulix Goettsch <ulix@u.washington.edu> |
| Sender: | owner-spridgets@autox.team.net |
Jeff, supposedly, your gas mileage won't be a s good. I think that is the only purpose of the vacuum advance/retard units (probably emissions too). Ulix On Wed, 26 May 1999, Jeff Boatright wrote: > Dear Listers, > > Is there an advantage/disadvantage to an all-mechanical advance distributor > vs the more common combination mechanical plus vacuum? > > Jeff > > Jeffrey H. Boatright, PhD > Senior Editor, Molecular Vision > http://www.molvis.org/molvis > "Seeing the Future in a Very Tiny Way" > > Ulix __/__,__ ___/__|__ ..............................................(_o____o_)....<_O_____O_/... '67 Sprite '74 X1/9 |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Oil Pressure, Ulix Goettsch |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Chateau Elan, Ulix Goettsch |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: mechanical advance, Frank Clarici |
| Next by Thread: | Re: mechanical advance, Ronsoave |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |