| To: | Phil Vanner <pvanner@pclink.com>, "'Swift Justice'" <samesq@pacbell.net>, "Ajhsys@aol.com" <Ajhsys@aol.com> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | RE: Roadster vs Convertible terminology (long) |
| From: | Peter C <nosimport@mailbag.com> |
| Date: | Wed, 13 Jan 1999 17:18:41 -0800 |
| Cc: | "spridgets@autox.team.net" <spridgets@autox.team.net> |
| In-reply-to: | <01BE3F08.49236FE0@phil> |
| Reply-to: | Peter C <nosimport@mailbag.com> |
| Sender: | owner-spridgets@autox.team.net |
Phil,
How does Phaeton fit into this? I thought it was convertible top for the
passengers and driver be damned ala definition 1 of coupe.
Peter C
At 03:07 PM 1/13/99 -0600, Phil Vanner wrote:
>Well here's my take on all this.
>>> a lot of research snipped, hope you read it 1st time around <<<<<<<
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | NYC Body Shop, Carl Elliott |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: 120hp, Larry and Sandi Miller |
| Previous by Thread: | GTO...no LBC, Christopher Palmer |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Roadster vs Convertible terminology (long), Rick/Carolyn |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |