| To: | AHSprite78@aol.com |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Octane ratings |
| From: | Ulix Goettsch <ulix@u.washington.edu> |
| Date: | Thu, 22 Oct 1998 21:08:32 -0700 (PDT) |
| Cc: | spridgets@Autox.Team.Net |
| In-reply-to: | <1419a1c4.362fde19@aol.com> |
| Reply-to: | Ulix Goettsch <ulix@u.washington.edu> |
| Sender: | owner-spridgets@Autox.Team.Net |
Matthew,
I would try the cheapest stuff first if your engine is stock. If it pings
get higher octane. I run Super because my engine pings with lower grade.
My engine is old and worn, carbon deposits and oil blowby lead to pinging.
Ulix
On Thu, 22 Oct 1998 AHSprite78@aol.com wrote:
> As my 2 year restoration comes to an end I was leafing through one of the many
> manuals that I have and noticed that they recomended the use of 100+ octane
> gas in performance engines and 94 octane for normal engines. What does
> everyone on the list run? Is the manual correct?
>
> Matthew Smith
> '67 Sprite
>
Ulix __/__,__
.......................................................... (_o____o_)....
'67 Sprite
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: storage suggestions, Amy Turner |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Issue # 10 of PDLJMPR, Ulix Goettsch |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Octane ratings, Frank Clarici |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Octane ratings, Trevor Boicey |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |