Mark van der Linden wrote:
> I also disagree with the remark that "I would prefer if messages
> sent on behalf of the "list" be cleared with the people on the
> list first." In a perfect world, we choose representatives on a
> democratic basis and than proceed. However, how to achieve this
> with respect to the list? Frank would probably have had to open
> confirmations/disapprovals for the next two weeks. Sending an email
> just in his own name probably does not have the impact (if any) than
> an email coming from the list.
????
By this logic I can start emailing whomever I want whatever I
want and claim to speak for the list?
"Dr. Mr. President/Prime Minister, the list has decided that you are
an undesirable and is mounting an assasination campaign?"
You seem to have decided that since it's a lot of work to actually
ASK what people beleive, you can just guess and then speak for all
of us. In reality there is a third choice that is very obvious,
don't.
--
Trevor Boicey, Ottawa, Canada.
tboicey@brit.ca, http://www.brit.ca/~tboicey/
|