spridgets
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Suspension ban in the works?!!!

To: spridgets@Autox.Team.Net
Subject: Re: Suspension ban in the works?!!!
From: Christopher T Palmer <ctp@gbn.org>
Date: Fri, 2 Jan 1998 12:04:53 +0100
Reply-to: Christopher T Palmer <ctp@gbn.org>
Sender: owner-spridgets@Autox.Team.Net
This was just posted on the MG mail list.
Please send it along.

>From: FunE4MG <FunE4MG@aol.com>
>Date: Fri, 2 Jan 1998 14:38:25 EST
>To: mgs@autox.team.net
>Subject: Re: Suspension ban in the works?!!!
>Organization: AOL (http://www.aol.com)
>Sender: owner-mgs@autox.team.net
>Precedence: bulk
>Reply-To: FunE4MG <FunE4MG@aol.com>
>
>OK GANG,
>This came to me via an interested party via the SEMA website today....It
>concerns Colorado residents now...who knows who it will affect
>later....knowing what California hobbyists did to get the recent SMOG law in
>place, maybe we should keep an eternally vigilant eye on politicians
>everywhere....
>Tom
>
>> >- ---------------------------------
>>  >LEGISLATIVE NOTICE
>>  >
>>  >BILL TO PROHIBIT ALTERED SUSPENSIONS
>>  >APPROVED BY COLORADO REVIEW COMMITTEE
>>  >
>>  >The Colorado Legislature's Transportation Legislation Review Committee has
>>  >given preliminary approval to a draft bill that would prohibit any person
>>  >from operating a motor vehicle on a public highway if the configuration of
>>  >the vehicle has been altered from the original manufacturer's
>>  >specifications. This measure is specifically designed to ban vehicles with
>>  >altered suspensions, but also pertains to tire or wheel size, body height,
>>  >chassis configuration and steering system. Violators could face fines of
>up
>>  >to $1,000.
>>  >SEMA supports reasonable and relevant safety laws regulations at both the
>>  >state and federal level and supports the model raised vehicle regulation
>>  >recommended by the American Association of Motor Vehicle Administrators.
>>  >Like some other states, however, Colorado appears poised to impose
>>  >unnecessarily restrictive and burdensome vehicle suspension requirements
>>  >without substantiating its claim that the legislation will improve highway
>>  >safety or provide other tangible benefits. In addition, it effectively
>>  >defers to the vehicle manufacturers to set the standards.
>>  >While this bill has not been formally introduced and Review Committee
>>  >approval does not ensure passage, we are extremely concerned that action
>on
>>  >the legislation may become an immediate priority when the legislature
>>  >reconvenes in January, 1998. We will be forwarding additional information
>> on
>>  >this important bill in the near future. In the meantime, please feel free
>> to
>>  >make copies of this notice for distribution to all interested parties.
>>  >For more information please contact stevem@sema.org.
>



<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>