spridgets
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Midget Disks WAS: Who's on this new list?

To: Larry Macy <macy@bblmail.psycha.upenn.edu>
Subject: Re: Midget Disks WAS: Who's on this new list?
From: Trevor Boicey <tboicey@brit.ca>
Date: Sun, 19 Oct 1997 04:21:27 -0400
Cc: Adrian <adrian@utk.edu>, Phil Vanner <pvanner@pclink.com>, spridgets@Autox.Team.Net
Organization: BRIT Inc
References: <199710190545.BAA26318@bblmail.psycha.upenn.edu>
Reply-to: Trevor Boicey <tboicey@brit.ca>
Sender: owner-spridgets@Autox.Team.Net
Larry Macy wrote:
> They make a REAR disc for the Midget?? I Am not sure that the overall
> convrsion is a good idea. THe balance would be all screwed up.

  Well, you could always set the balance right. But you
might find that the balance is so light on the rears
that the discs are useless.

  The main advantage to discs is that they don't fade
from heat. Very important in the front since they do
most of the stopping and get really hot. But with such
a light car and in the back, you might be hard pressed
to make a case that your back brake fade is really cutting
into your lap times.

  I have all wheel discs in my Toyota, and they are nice,
but they are more complex than discs. A lot of this is
because the back brakes are both discs and drums, the
drums being the handbrake. These units are complex and
from what I hear often have serious corrosion problems.

  How do four-wheel-disc midgets handle the handbrake issue?

-- 
Trevor Boicey
Ottawa, Canada
tboicey@brit.ca
http://www.brit.ca/~tboicey/

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>